Have you seen the recent Barclays ads? The ones that end with the strapline "Now there's an idea".
There's been a little controversy about them this week and that coincides nicely with a change in my feelings about the work. When I first saw the ads I liked them. They had a little humour and they didn't go for some of the ridiculous big philosophical themes that banking ads normally use.
Media wise Canary Wharf tube station has been invaded by this campaign. No harm in that, it makes a big splash and seeing as their HQ is in Canary Wharf that seems like a good idea. So far so good.
A friend of mine who's big in the banking world has been telling me for ages that the senior staff at Barclays hate those ads, that they're patronising and too wishy washy for a bank. I dismissed his view, because he is a banking expert not an advertising expert.
Yesterday I was in Canary Wharf and I saw this ad.
Look a little closer at the headline.
"Barclays Magicians. Perform vanishing acts when it's their round, but never fail to pull a good idea out of the hat."
There is so much wrong with that headline I don't know where to start. We'll leave aside the fact that
"Perform vanishing acts when it's their round, but never fail to pull a good idea out of the hat."
isn't a very good sentence and we'll think about what it means. What sort of company wants to tell the world that their employees don't stand their round? Especially in the country that invented the pub and especially in the industry where drinking and bravado is a big part of the culture. The writer is trying too pull off a double pun that simply doesn't work. A case of one execution too many.
Look at this one.
Barclays Creatives. That "Barclays" should have an apostrophe after it, as should "Barclays Magicians". I'm a designer and I can spot that, so to a writer that should stand out a mile. What are Barclays' Creatives? Do they employ an in house creative team? Of course not, I can see what they're trying to imply but it doesn't work. In fact the whole campaign is starting to look a little over worked and tired. How did my mate put it? Patronising and wishy washy?
At the start of this post I mentioned "a little controversy" . Last week in Marketing magazine former Barclaycard marketer Mike Hoban slagged off the campaign for being "juvenile" and "insulting to staff". The ads were also derided at The Marketing Society's Money Forum.
Seems like my mate was right and I was wrong. I'd better buy him a drink.
Recent Comments